<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dear Brands: Will You Talk to Me on Twitter?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ariwriter.com/dear-brands-will-you-talk-to-me-on-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ariwriter.com/dear-brands-will-you-talk-to-me-on-twitter/</link>
	<description>Strategies and tips on social media and online marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:20:22 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Morgan</title>
		<link>http://ariwriter.com/dear-brands-will-you-talk-to-me-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-3912</link>
		<dc:creator>Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 01:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ariwriter.com/?p=1131#comment-3912</guid>
		<description>While I applaud your idea, the execution may need some tuning over the course of the experiment.  

You seem to be a savvy user of the tools and of social media theory, so I hope you won&#039;t mind if I speak plainly as one of the subjects of your experiment. (yes, I&#039;m clearly stepping outside the bounds of scientist and subject to discuss methodology)

In an effort to show transparency, I&#039;m the person responsible for the Twitter account of JetBlue Airways.  When I saw your @BrandCustomer tweet directed at @JetBlue this morning asking for more information on the account &#039;handeler,&#039; I certainly did respond, though likely not in the manner you may have expected:  I responded via my personal Twitter account: @MHJohnston.  Your request was for more transparency from me, and I&#039;m happy to oblige.

I would posit that any business that interacts with @BrandCustomer as they would any other user, may require further investigation into their social media acuity as with a bit of looking around, it&#039;s quickly discovered that the entire effort is an individual&#039;s experiment.

Businesses interacting with @BrandCustomer as if it were a &#039;real&#039; customer must then be split in to two additional categories: those who go along to appease your desire for the illusion of a customer dialogue - but will risk bias in their responses, or those companies that are only doing surface scanning of Twitter feeds believing it to be an actual customer, and will certainly miss out on the real conversation that actually is occurring.  Which of these is a more responsible citizen of social media?

While I may like to pretend I&#039;m observant enough to try to play the role of the former business case, I&#039;m likely closer to the later where I scan, but rarely dig into the profile of those who have requests of us.  However, your tweet triggered a secondary glance for one often overlooked reason:  While there&#039;s a desire to answer questions, there&#039;s also a need to balance that with a requirement to act responsibly for the rest of our followers.  

As willing as I was to be transparent, the answer would have been of little use to the rest of our 8,200+ followers.  In these circumstances I&#039;d try to DM - which you pointedly aren&#039;t allowing as @BrandCustomer doesn&#039;t reciprocally follow.  

(This gives rise to another question - At what level is a company required to maneuver to help a customer who doesn&#039;t understand or isn&#039;t willing to work within the limitations and &#039;norms&#039; of a tool?  I suspect the level is in correlation to the importance - and legitimacy of the request.)

As our Twitter account has grown and responded to the needs of our followers I feel that our particular public corporate feed isn&#039;t the place for the self-referential discourse on corporate roles in Social Media.  To put it more bluntly and in my own personal feelings: If Twitter is to be excepted as a legitimate tool within society we need to stop the naval gazing and focus on using the tools in everyday practice.  Those of us who remember the early days of blogging will certainly recall a similar amount of introspection when we all gloried in, &quot;the power of the blogger&quot; - but it wasn&#039;t until the posturing stopped and actually writing began that the promise of the medium was recognized by the public at large.  

While I&#039;m certainly interested in the role of businesses in social media (as evidenced by this ever-growing comment - it&#039;s a subject I&#039;ve put a lot of thought into) I&#039;m determined to keep at least the tent-pole Twitter identity of @JetBlue clear of the meta-discourse often asked of it, and strive to be the service our customers wish it to be.

All this being said, I also understand that you - @ariherzog are also at least a potential customer and should have your opinions factor in to how our role is shaped on Twitter.  So I&#039;ll certainly ask if you or any of your readers think I&#039;m on the right track.  Conversations and experiments such as yours are certainly important in understanding where the center-line is, and I&#039;m always willing to course-correct should it be required.

And I&#039;m always willing to get into the theory of it all on my personal Twitter account.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I applaud your idea, the execution may need some tuning over the course of the experiment.  </p>
<p>You seem to be a savvy user of the tools and of social media theory, so I hope you won&#8217;t mind if I speak plainly as one of the subjects of your experiment. (yes, I&#8217;m clearly stepping outside the bounds of scientist and subject to discuss methodology)</p>
<p>In an effort to show transparency, I&#8217;m the person responsible for the Twitter account of JetBlue Airways.  When I saw your @BrandCustomer tweet directed at @JetBlue this morning asking for more information on the account &#8216;handeler,&#8217; I certainly did respond, though likely not in the manner you may have expected:  I responded via my personal Twitter account: @MHJohnston.  Your request was for more transparency from me, and I&#8217;m happy to oblige.</p>
<p>I would posit that any business that interacts with @BrandCustomer as they would any other user, may require further investigation into their social media acuity as with a bit of looking around, it&#8217;s quickly discovered that the entire effort is an individual&#8217;s experiment.</p>
<p>Businesses interacting with @BrandCustomer as if it were a &#8216;real&#8217; customer must then be split in to two additional categories: those who go along to appease your desire for the illusion of a customer dialogue &#8211; but will risk bias in their responses, or those companies that are only doing surface scanning of Twitter feeds believing it to be an actual customer, and will certainly miss out on the real conversation that actually is occurring.  Which of these is a more responsible citizen of social media?</p>
<p>While I may like to pretend I&#8217;m observant enough to try to play the role of the former business case, I&#8217;m likely closer to the later where I scan, but rarely dig into the profile of those who have requests of us.  However, your tweet triggered a secondary glance for one often overlooked reason:  While there&#8217;s a desire to answer questions, there&#8217;s also a need to balance that with a requirement to act responsibly for the rest of our followers.  </p>
<p>As willing as I was to be transparent, the answer would have been of little use to the rest of our 8,200+ followers.  In these circumstances I&#8217;d try to DM &#8211; which you pointedly aren&#8217;t allowing as @BrandCustomer doesn&#8217;t reciprocally follow.  </p>
<p>(This gives rise to another question &#8211; At what level is a company required to maneuver to help a customer who doesn&#8217;t understand or isn&#8217;t willing to work within the limitations and &#8216;norms&#8217; of a tool?  I suspect the level is in correlation to the importance &#8211; and legitimacy of the request.)</p>
<p>As our Twitter account has grown and responded to the needs of our followers I feel that our particular public corporate feed isn&#8217;t the place for the self-referential discourse on corporate roles in Social Media.  To put it more bluntly and in my own personal feelings: If Twitter is to be excepted as a legitimate tool within society we need to stop the naval gazing and focus on using the tools in everyday practice.  Those of us who remember the early days of blogging will certainly recall a similar amount of introspection when we all gloried in, &#8220;the power of the blogger&#8221; &#8211; but it wasn&#8217;t until the posturing stopped and actually writing began that the promise of the medium was recognized by the public at large.  </p>
<p>While I&#8217;m certainly interested in the role of businesses in social media (as evidenced by this ever-growing comment &#8211; it&#8217;s a subject I&#8217;ve put a lot of thought into) I&#8217;m determined to keep at least the tent-pole Twitter identity of @JetBlue clear of the meta-discourse often asked of it, and strive to be the service our customers wish it to be.</p>
<p>All this being said, I also understand that you &#8211; @ariherzog are also at least a potential customer and should have your opinions factor in to how our role is shaped on Twitter.  So I&#8217;ll certainly ask if you or any of your readers think I&#8217;m on the right track.  Conversations and experiments such as yours are certainly important in understanding where the center-line is, and I&#8217;m always willing to course-correct should it be required.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;m always willing to get into the theory of it all on my personal Twitter account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Cass</title>
		<link>http://ariwriter.com/dear-brands-will-you-talk-to-me-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-3665</link>
		<dc:creator>John Cass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 17:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ariwriter.com/?p=1131#comment-3665</guid>
		<description>I did the cross check, I did not find any new Fortune 500 companies with blogs from Pete&#039;s list. Most of the f500 have been reviewed in the last year, but I still do need help with completing the list.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;John Cass´s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://pr.typepad.com/pr_communications/2008/12/firs-trust-in-blogging-panel-.html&quot;&gt;FIR’s Trust In Blogging Panel&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did the cross check, I did not find any new Fortune 500 companies with blogs from Pete&#8217;s list. Most of the f500 have been reviewed in the last year, but I still do need help with completing the list.</p>
<p><abbr><em>John Cass´s last blog post..<a href="http://pr.typepad.com/pr_communications/2008/12/firs-trust-in-blogging-panel-.html">FIR’s Trust In Blogging Panel</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Branding the Los Angeles Times on Twitter &#8212; AriWriter</title>
		<link>http://ariwriter.com/dear-brands-will-you-talk-to-me-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-3639</link>
		<dc:creator>Branding the Los Angeles Times on Twitter &#8212; AriWriter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 18:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ariwriter.com/?p=1131#comment-3639</guid>
		<description>[...] Women on Do You Challenge the Status Quo?Ricardo Bueno on Unsubscribing Should Be EasyAndrewN on Dear Brands: Will You Talk to Me on Twitter?Nick Lucido on Dear Brands: Will You Talk to Me on Twitter?Andrew on Why I Love These 15 Wordpress [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Women on Do You Challenge the Status Quo?Ricardo Bueno on Unsubscribing Should Be EasyAndrewN on Dear Brands: Will You Talk to Me on Twitter?Nick Lucido on Dear Brands: Will You Talk to Me on Twitter?Andrew on Why I Love These 15 Wordpress [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndrewN</title>
		<link>http://ariwriter.com/dear-brands-will-you-talk-to-me-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-3631</link>
		<dc:creator>AndrewN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 07:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ariwriter.com/?p=1131#comment-3631</guid>
		<description>Hi Ari, looking forward to your followup blog post. Ping me if you&#039;d like to do an interview beforehand. I&#039;m curious to learn more about what you mean by &lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/ariherzog/statuses/1070190413&quot;&gt;&quot;They&#039;re not what they claim on Twitter.&quot;&lt;/a&gt;

- AndrewN, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.latimes.com/sm&quot;&gt;social media guy&lt;/a&gt; in the LA Times / latimes.com newsroom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ari, looking forward to your followup blog post. Ping me if you&#8217;d like to do an interview beforehand. I&#8217;m curious to learn more about what you mean by <a href="http://twitter.com/ariherzog/statuses/1070190413">&#8220;They&#8217;re not what they claim on Twitter.&#8221;</a></p>
<p>- AndrewN, <a href="http://www.latimes.com/sm">social media guy</a> in the LA Times / latimes.com newsroom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Lucido</title>
		<link>http://ariwriter.com/dear-brands-will-you-talk-to-me-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-3630</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Lucido</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 06:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ariwriter.com/?p=1131#comment-3630</guid>
		<description>I posted a request on my Twitter asking for advice on a blog post I was writing. As an intern, I was asking professionals on good intern etiquette. 

Southwest Airlines (@southwestair) sent me a DM with some great advice. There was no plug about flying Southwest next time or anything like that. It was just there to genuinely help me out. Hey, there&#039;s got to be someone running the Twitter account, and this was a nice reminder that those people are humans, too.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Nick Lucido´s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://nicklucido.wordpress.com/2008/12/19/goals-in-the-workplace/&quot;&gt;Goals in the Workplace&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I posted a request on my Twitter asking for advice on a blog post I was writing. As an intern, I was asking professionals on good intern etiquette. </p>
<p>Southwest Airlines (@southwestair) sent me a DM with some great advice. There was no plug about flying Southwest next time or anything like that. It was just there to genuinely help me out. Hey, there&#8217;s got to be someone running the Twitter account, and this was a nice reminder that those people are humans, too.</p>
<p><abbr><em>Nick Lucido´s last blog post..<a href="http://nicklucido.wordpress.com/2008/12/19/goals-in-the-workplace/">Goals in the Workplace</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndrewN</title>
		<link>http://ariwriter.com/dear-brands-will-you-talk-to-me-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-3394</link>
		<dc:creator>AndrewN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ariwriter.com/?p=1131#comment-3394</guid>
		<description>Hi Ari, we&#039;re now following you on Twitter. Please reciprocate by following the Los Angeles Times (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.twitter.com/latimes&quot;&gt;@latimes&lt;/a&gt;) at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.twitter.com/latimes&quot;&gt;www.twitter.com/latimes&lt;/a&gt; so that we can engage in meaningful two-way, albeit asynchronous, conversation with you and your personal brand.

While you&#039;re at it, I&#039;d love to see some serious analysis of the value of real-time versus asynchronous conversations, and recommendations on when one-to-one communication is more appropriate than blogging and one-to-many blasts.

Sincerely,
- AndrewN, social media guy in the LA Times / latimes.com newsroom

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;AndrewN´s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/latimes/news/~3/H5Il5p6WD0M/la-na-blackwater9-2008dec09,0,1731408.story&quot;&gt;U.S. details case against Blackwater guards&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ari, we&#8217;re now following you on Twitter. Please reciprocate by following the Los Angeles Times (<a href="http://www.twitter.com/latimes">@latimes</a>) at <a href="http://www.twitter.com/latimes">http://www.twitter.com/latimes</a> so that we can engage in meaningful two-way, albeit asynchronous, conversation with you and your personal brand.</p>
<p>While you&#8217;re at it, I&#8217;d love to see some serious analysis of the value of real-time versus asynchronous conversations, and recommendations on when one-to-one communication is more appropriate than blogging and one-to-many blasts.</p>
<p>Sincerely,<br />
- AndrewN, social media guy in the LA Times / latimes.com newsroom</p>
<p><abbr><em>AndrewN´s last blog post..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/latimes/news/~3/H5Il5p6WD0M/la-na-blackwater9-2008dec09,0,1731408.story">U.S. details case against Blackwater guards</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://ariwriter.com/dear-brands-will-you-talk-to-me-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-3355</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 05:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ariwriter.com/?p=1131#comment-3355</guid>
		<description>I think John is right, and Brogan mentioned it recently - the magic of twitter is in the research it allows. I manage a company account and we do follow your advice of keeping track of our own and our competitor mentions. I used the search.twitter. tool and set up an RSS feed into a company Google reader account. (Also I keep track of key phrases related to our work.)

However, I do not think I will be following @BrandConsumer anytime soon.  I try to keep a pretty strict rule with the company account of only following accounts that are willing to follow back. Certainly a debated issue, I see the openness of conversation as a goal. Plus, I think we offer valuable tweets, through which people in the industry can get useful links. 

In sum, our company uses twitter to search. We use our account to converse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think John is right, and Brogan mentioned it recently &#8211; the magic of twitter is in the research it allows. I manage a company account and we do follow your advice of keeping track of our own and our competitor mentions. I used the search.twitter. tool and set up an RSS feed into a company Google reader account. (Also I keep track of key phrases related to our work.)</p>
<p>However, I do not think I will be following @BrandConsumer anytime soon.  I try to keep a pretty strict rule with the company account of only following accounts that are willing to follow back. Certainly a debated issue, I see the openness of conversation as a goal. Plus, I think we offer valuable tweets, through which people in the industry can get useful links. </p>
<p>In sum, our company uses twitter to search. We use our account to converse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
