Proof That Facebook is Censoring You

by Ari Herzog on March 13, 2009 · 73 comments

On a hunch by Craig Thomler that Facebook censors references to the word Twitter, I decided to put my money where my fingers are and type some test updates.

You won’t believe this.

Take a look (in reverse chronological order):

10 Facebook status updates I wrote you will never see

Note how I inserted numbers into the 10 test posts.

When I refreshed the page and clicked to my personal wall of updates, take another look:

Two Facebook updates are not the same as twelve

The proof is in the screen shots.

Facebook is censoring you. Not just for profanity, but also for the word “Twitter” and even the phrase “Facebook sucks.” If this is legal, it’s a damn shame because I don’t like to be censored when talking to my friends.

UPDATE: As you will see from various comments below, my demo can only be repeated if you rapid-fire so many messages in a given time period. However, as Adriel refers below, there were other people over the course of several hours who witnessed Facebook censoring the word “Twitter” in updates.

Over 30,000 global visitors read AriWriter every month, with thousands opting to receive daily alerts every morning. Please choose from the RSS feed or email delivery to join them.

Related posts:

  1. Why Facebook Bans Must Stop
  2. LinkedIn MySpace Facebook Twitter Time

{ 1 trackback }

Facebook is Evil « Adriel Hampton
March 14, 2009 at 12:16 AM

{ 72 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Jim Belfiore March 13, 2009 at 10:06 PM Twitter: @jsbelfiore

Interesting. I saw your tweets earlier this evening and made just one status update similar to yours and it hasn’t been removed. (Though it also has a bunch of comments from my friends, so maybe that’s keeping it from being deleted?)

I can’t say that FB’s new look and feel has been positive.

Jim Belfiore´s last blog post..Lessons from the Roof: A Case (Study) of the Shingles

Reply

2 Joe April 23, 2009 at 5:06 PM

May I also point out that this is not a scientifically strenuous test at all. If you wanted it to be accurate, you should have set up more experiments, on multiple accounts, with different status updates. If for you made a string of statuses that read “Facebook is awesome! I love Facebook! [1-10]” and THEY got deleted it, it would disprove your notion of censorship right away, as Facebook would have no reason to censor positive feedback for the site. My guess is that they would be deleted, as Facebook automatically deletes multiple status updates that are within a certain number of seconds from each other.

Good try though.

Reply

3 Kim Woodbridge March 13, 2009 at 10:08 PM Twitter: @kwbridge

Hi Ari – I tested it with one status update when I saw your tweet about it and like Jim, mine wasn’t removed either. Mine has comments on it too.

Kim Woodbridge´s last blog post..3 Sites to Help You Find New Recipes

Reply

4 Ari Herzog March 13, 2009 at 10:12 PM Twitter: @ariherzog

Maybe it’s a smart censor?

Reply

5 Lyndis April 20, 2009 at 9:58 AM

Facebook? Doing dumb things to try and prevent abuse? >.>

Obviously the designers haven’t been clued into last century design: Cooldowns. Cooldowns are a period of time in which you can’t do something after doing this same thing. So if you post, and there’s a cooldown of 2 minutes, you can’t post for 2 minutes.

I mean really… They’ve been “censoring” as long as I can remember. You can’t have your name unless it’s in their book of names… Which is a pretty bad book. Name censorship is impossible. Good lord what made them think that was a good idea? Names are created and lost constantly. You can make them up!

I’ve tried to deal with them a couple of times, but frankly they piss me off too frequently. If it’s not one thing, it’s another!

Eck… You’ll never catch me on Facebook as long as they pull stuff like this. I don’t have the patience or interest to deal with them.

Reply

6 Nathaniel April 21, 2009 at 11:25 PM

From what i noticed, each of ur posts were one directly after the other (like within several seconds). In my experience FB is smart in their posting of your status. In the past when i have typed a status and realized i typed something wrong or didnt actually want it and i changed it right away… the original version disappears completely. If you want to test this properly each post you make containing “twitter” should be at least 5-10 min apart from each other.

Reply

7 Geoff Girardin March 13, 2009 at 10:09 PM Twitter: @geoffgirardin

I’ve just done some tests of my own, and the only updates that have disappeared were ones that said ‘The following updates are tests.’

Geoff Girardin´s last blog post..Review: No Line on the Horizon by U2

Reply

8 doctorblogs (annabel bentley) March 13, 2009 at 10:11 PM

Twitter Comment


Facebook censors updates with “Twitter ” in – treated same as swear word! [link to post] #facebookdeletesTwitter

– Posted using Chat Catcher

Reply

9 Matthew Gilbert March 13, 2009 at 10:14 PM Twitter: @doctorious

Perhaps I am not recreating your experiment in the same way (by “personal wall” you just mean my “wall,” correct?). But I have a few updates mentioning Twitter, plus a link to a news article — none are being censored.

– Matt

Reply

10 ladyexec (LadyExec) March 13, 2009 at 10:16 PM

Twitter Comment


Proof That Facebook is Censoring You [link to post]

– Posted using Chat Catcher

Reply

11 Ed Bennett March 13, 2009 at 10:18 PM Twitter: @edbennett

Ari – FYI, I tried a couple tests, no deletions

Ed Bennett´s last blog post..HSNL Update #6 March 3, 2009

Reply

12 Jeff Anderson March 13, 2009 at 10:22 PM Twitter: @maxofacto

Ari, FB regularly deletes my updates no matter the comment when made that close in succession – only the last one sticks. Tried it on my FB and it seems to be just fine. As do curse words…

Reply

13 Ari Herzog March 13, 2009 at 10:29 PM Twitter: @ariherzog

Hmm. So, it’s succession? Thinking your a spammer? That could explain it… Not right, but could explain it.

Reply

14 Mike March 14, 2009 at 4:59 AM

Yes, I tried ti too. It deletes comments made within about a minute of each other. Obviously spam protection. Guess you’d better change your post…

Mike´s last blog post..JLPT1 2008 Results

Reply

15 Daedalus April 21, 2009 at 5:20 PM

This may not be spam protection. I’ve known about it for a long time; it’s handy for making corrections and fixing typos. FB’s logic, presumably, is that any update soon after a previous one is meant to overwrite it.

But you’ll need a test with pauses or comments to determine if there’s really a “Twitter effect” on Facebook.

Daedalus´s last blog post..Doodlemaker: colorful random walk in Pygame

Reply

16 SiN20 (Webmaster Podcast) March 13, 2009 at 10:27 PM

Twitter Comment


is this Proof That Facebook is Censoring You [link to post] ??

– Posted using Chat Catcher

Reply

17 Nicole Fougere March 13, 2009 at 10:29 PM Twitter: @schnicker

I think all it proves is FB doesn’t post every single status update you make if there is not much time between them..

If you write a status update and make a spelling error, so you go in a few seconds later and correct it, it only shows the final update.

I guess it’s because if you’re not leaving enough time between updates to actually get a blank status update box again, then it will accept what you write as a correction to the original status.

Nicole Fougere´s last blog post..7 Things To Avoid in Online Training Video Design

Reply

18 Ari Herzog March 13, 2009 at 10:39 PM Twitter: @ariherzog

…as if preventing someone from posting an update numerous times in a short time span is any better. What if a plane just crashed, and I’m updating several times a minute? If they all appear on Twitter and not on Facebook, what does that tell you? What does that mean to you if you’re watching on Facebook?

Reply

19 Phil Baumann March 13, 2009 at 10:32 PM Twitter: @PhilBaumann

I’m disappointed: I was actually hoping FB deleted my Twitter reference so I could hate it even more.

Oh well, I’ll keep an eye on it. That is whack how that happened to you. Maybe @finkd is stalking you.

Phil

Phil Baumann´s last blog post..Daily Diigo Discoveries 03/11/2009

Reply

20 epiphyte March 13, 2009 at 10:41 PM

sensationalist post. if you quickly update your status it removes the previous one (think typos). censor yourself.

Reply

21 Sean March 13, 2009 at 10:47 PM

Actually, I posted a status of “Twitter is lame, it’s Facebook’s status updates without the rest of Facebook” so they don’t filter the word twitter.

Reply

22 daghtcom (Deborah) March 13, 2009 at 11:17 PM

Twitter Comment


Proof That Facebook is Censoring You? [link to post]

– Posted using Chat Catcher

Reply

23 Geoff Girardin March 14, 2009 at 12:01 AM Twitter: @geoffgirardin

The deletion of succession makes sense, rather than singling out the Twitter service and censoring it out. Facebook has a twitter account, which I imagine they would delete if they wanted to weed Twitter out of their site. They would probably delete the Twitter application(s) too.

I agree with you, Ari, that the deletion of rapid updates is wrong. I see it as a dev team that is trying to prevent spam in all the wrong ways.

Geoff Girardin´s last blog post..How Do You Explain Twitter?

Reply

24 Adriel Hampton March 14, 2009 at 12:28 AM Twitter: @adrielhampton

This was not an issue of quick posts in succession, except maybe in Ari’s demo. It happened to many people over the course of a few hours, totally unrelated to succession of updates (mine were three hours apart – see @craigthomler, @kateedwards)), until Facebook changed it as word spread through Twitter. Who is behind the curtain over there?

Adriel Hampton´s last blog post..Facebook is Evil

Reply

25 Mike Dammann March 14, 2009 at 1:25 AM Twitter: @firetown

I was wondering why some of my tweets didn´t make it to FB.

Mike Dammann´s last blog post..Appeal says juror sent ‘tweets’ during $12.6M case

Reply

26 AntonioDomingo March 14, 2009 at 6:24 AM Twitter: @AntonioDomingo

Facebook censors updates with “Twitter ”
If they think that is the way, are far away of they must do.
We are not in China, we want a networks were we can talk without any censors, about twitter or we want any time, and if they think in other way, is easy, we’ll change to other network.

Reply

27 dany saadia March 14, 2009 at 1:32 PM Twitter: @danysaadia

Repeat the experiment but give a little more time between updates. You’ll see nothing happens. This post can become a FUD.

Reply

28 AntonioDomingo March 14, 2009 at 2:19 PM Twitter: @AntonioDomingo

Dany Saadia, I have probed waiting a lot of time, but some updates never appear, and this only happens when there are some words: twitter, followers…
Is true that this don’t happen not all the times, only sometimes, but if only one time is true, is terrible.

Reply

29 Danny Brown March 14, 2009 at 1:58 PM Twitter: @DannyBrown

First thing I did yesterday when I saw the new look was to post about it’s ripping off of Twitter.

Still there – maybe they realized I took snapshots of them and posted to TwitPic? ;-)

Either way, Facebook continues to go the same slippery slope that MySpace did and look where they are now.

Danny Brown´s last blog post..Melrose Jewelers, Rolex and Owen Wilson – The Sequel

Reply

30 Stacy Lukas March 15, 2009 at 12:08 AM Twitter: @damnredhead

I had a status for a day or so about how my cat now has a Twitter account and nothing happened.

Stacy Lukas´s last blog post..Why I’m not playing #FollowFriday anymore

Reply

31 Mcfixit (Steve Johnson) March 15, 2009 at 9:42 PM

Twitter Comment


I can’t believe this is really happening:
[link to post]

– Posted using Chat Catcher

Reply

32 Mcfixit (Steve Johnson) March 15, 2009 at 9:49 PM

Twitter Comment


I can’t believe this is really happening: [link to post]

– Posted using Chat Catcher

Reply

33 reechard (Richard Walker) March 15, 2009 at 11:56 PM

Twitter Comment


Proof That Facebook is Censoring You — AriWriter [link to post]

– Posted using Chat Catcher

Reply

34 ATISocialMktg (ATI Attraction Mktg) March 16, 2009 at 12:08 AM

Twitter Comment


Is Facebook censoring posts? [link to post]

– Posted using Chat Catcher

Reply

35 Travis Jensen March 16, 2009 at 12:16 AM

Yeah, mine got through, mentioning the evil Facebook censoring Twitter. Unfortunately, people will see the title, may read the original article, but won’t go further to realize that this is an erroneous conclusion. The poster needs to retract, IMO.

Reply

36 fifty4cats (Elena Isayenko) March 16, 2009 at 12:21 AM

Twitter Comment


Hmm… Proof That Facebook is Censoring You [link to post]

– Posted using Chat Catcher

Reply

37 Konstantin March 16, 2009 at 12:28 AM Twitter: @redwolf21

I don’t think Facebook is censoring you. I just tried this myself and found that it didn’t post random updates in between the twitter post tests. I think what is happening is that when you post an update, Facebook waits a certain amount of time before actually posting it to the timeline and their servers so that you get a chance to correct it (if you need to). So basically if you post something about “twitter” and leave it as that for a while, it will show up and will not be censored.

Reply

38 DivaTomboy (Dianne Reum) March 16, 2009 at 1:07 AM

Twitter Comment


Is Facebook censoring? I’ve experienced it. [link to post]

– Posted using Chat Catcher

Reply

39 Kikolani March 16, 2009 at 1:59 AM Twitter: @kikolani

I wouldn’t be surprised if they were censoring things, but I have had the same thing where if I post one update, then another within a minute or two, only the final update posts. The others disappear. I always thought it was just in case you made a mistake, people wouldn’t see the duplicate content in their news feeds.

Seems funny that they would censor Twitter, considering there is that plugin now that lets you use selective Twitter updates as Facebook updates with the #fb at the end.

~ Kristi

Kikolani´s last blog post..Fetching Friday – Web 2.0 At the Bookstore, Twitter Resources

Reply

40 reechard (Richard Walker) March 16, 2009 at 3:09 AM

FriendFeed Comment


Proof… [link to post]

– Posted using Chat Catcher

Reply

41 dobata (Dobromir Hadzhiev) March 16, 2009 at 4:03 AM

FriendFeed Comment


Proof That Facebook is Censoring You – via Louis [link to post]

– Posted using Chat Catcher

Reply

42 joedawson (Joe Dawson) March 16, 2009 at 4:52 AM

Twitter Comment


Retweeting @dobata: Proof That Facebook is Censoring You [link to post]

– Posted using Chat Catcher

Reply

43 mikeashworth (Mike Ashworth) March 16, 2009 at 6:05 AM

Twitter Comment


Is Facebook censoring its users? [link to post]

– Posted using Chat Catcher

Reply

44 elenakostovska (Elena Kostovska) March 16, 2009 at 7:28 AM

Twitter Comment


Proof That Facebook is Censoring You | AriWriter: [link to post]

– Posted using Chat Catcher

Reply

45 chrishogg (Chris Hogg) March 16, 2009 at 8:51 AM

Twitter Comment


Not sure I believe this. Facebook censors the word “Twitter”? [link to post]

– Posted using Chat Catcher

Reply

46 notronwest (Ron West) March 16, 2009 at 9:28 AM

Twitter Comment


Facebook censoring Twitter – Believe it or not?: [link to post]

– Posted using Chat Catcher

Reply

47 Moxie March 16, 2009 at 10:29 AM Twitter: @AskMoxie

But.

Anytime you make a bunch of rapid-fire updates on any topic the same thing happens. It’s because if you update that frequently the FB algorithm is set to think that you’re correcting spelling or typos or whatever and it only keeps the most recent update.

I’m not saying FB *isn’t* censoring references to Twitter. But this particular test doesn’t prove it. You could do the same thing with just numbers and the same thing would happen, unless you spaced them just the right amount apart.

Moxie´s last blog post..Q&A: How do I change the bedtime routine?

Reply

48 pkuras (Patrick Kuras) March 16, 2009 at 12:23 PM

Twitter Comment


Facebook censors status updates with “Twitter” in them [link to post]

– Posted using Chat Catcher

Reply

49 Craig March 16, 2009 at 12:25 PM Twitter: @budgetpulse

I’m surprised they would censor Twitter. I know people may give them negative feedback and approving Twitter, but if nothing else it’s a great way to do research to see what exactly users are saying. If enough people noticed them removing content like that, then there will be bigger complaints.

Reply

50 Tracey March 16, 2009 at 12:42 PM Twitter: @traceystamps

I’ve run into this several times. I was disappointed.

Reply

51 ArthurGermain (Arthur Germain) March 16, 2009 at 2:12 PM

Twitter Comment


Amazing, FB really is pulling posts with the word twitter in them. Go try it. RT Facebook is censoring you: [link to post]

– Posted using Chat Catcher

Reply

52 EdwardGiordano (EdwardGiordano) March 17, 2009 at 12:48 AM

Twitter Comment


@hitekelvis [link to post] crazy

– Posted using Chat Catcher

Reply

53 ohmissalex (alex rutter) March 19, 2009 at 1:51 PM

Twitter Comment


@economist i’m ok with that. facebook sucks. & they know they suck too. check this out: [link to post]

– Posted using Chat Catcher

Reply

54 Majento March 21, 2009 at 5:21 AM Twitter: @Majento

Liked this post + experiment, and glad i found your blog, lots of interesting reads, Sholem Aleykhem :-)

Reply

55 brandonstuff85 (Brandon Peters) March 22, 2009 at 4:15 PM

Twitter Comment


@lukelucas this is what i saw last week or so [link to post]

– Posted using Chat Catcher

Reply

56 WayneNH (Wayne Kurtzman) March 23, 2009 at 6:58 PM

Twitter Comment


Proof That Facebook is Censoring You … [link to post] – by @AriHerzog

– Posted using Chat Catcher

Reply

57 jv March 23, 2009 at 7:53 PM Twitter: @newts

Dude, sucky as facebook may be you can ask for your money back and go somewhere else. It is their site to edit/censor/whatever. But thanks for shining another light on them. As much as I like to connect with people on FB there is something sinister with it.

jv´s last blog post..RFID Catdoor Pictures

Reply

58 bobdobbs March 24, 2009 at 9:07 AM

Not true. Use twitter, swear words and say facebook sucks all the time, never ever censored. It just identified you as a spammer. Why are insignificant people always so quick to jump to the paranoid conclusion that anyone cares about their meaningless little lives? Facebook cares only about money. You seemed like a spammer, in economic competition perhaps, that’s all.

Reply

59 Thomas April 13, 2009 at 6:21 PM

Saw you’re article, did some tests of my own. Twitter is not censored. Its possible that there’s an anti-double post mechanism that deleted your comments. But thats too hard for you to figure out. Go on with conspiracy about Facebook censorship.

Reply

60 anon May 3, 2009 at 1:24 AM

it wont let me share a link for a torrent site. or make it my status.

Reply

61 bmenews April 14, 2009 at 5:20 PM

I do not use facebook anymore.. Many people can see my privacy..

bmenews´s last blog post..Samsung MITs M400

Reply

62 twelvepercent April 24, 2009 at 4:32 AM

If you don’t like being censored than I suggest you stop using facebook and stop complaining.

Reply

63 J Lit April 24, 2009 at 9:19 AM

It is because you updated the status’ so close to each other, i noticed that they are all within about 2 seconds. they are overriding each other, try it again with more time inbetween

Reply

64 Dan April 28, 2009 at 4:46 AM

As J Lit says, if you change your facebook status rapidly within a certain time frame it doesn’t keep all of them, so if you make a spelling mistake it doesn’t have about 20 updates saying the same thing.

If facebook really wanted to censor twitter they wouldn’t have the twitter app in the first place.

Reply

65 Mackle April 28, 2009 at 10:45 AM

I’m not so sure this is true. I’ve made numerous references to my Twitter account, including references stating how I disliked that FB seemed to be trying to mimic Twitter and that, if Twitter had a better profile option, I would prefer it OVER FB (I hate those damn polls and quizzes, mostly).

If there was censoring going on, those posts should have been removed.

Reply

66 Taylor April 28, 2009 at 6:46 PM

Yeah… that’s not true… you can even update your status on facebook VIA twitter… They just condense your statuses if you keep updating them every two seconds because it’s annoying to see a whole wall of status, also, many people quickly change statuses when they’ve made a mistake on the previous status. so you’re wrong, you’ve discovered nothing, they’re not censoring us from anything but putting porn up… however they do legally own any photos you put up on their site.

Reply

67 Sean May 1, 2009 at 9:24 AM Twitter: @no

It’s kind of obvious that FB doesn’t delete posts with “Twitter” in them because it used to be that if you had a Twitter account you could link the two and update your FB status via your Twitter. And many of my posts contain profanity and I’ve never had one deleted.

Reply

68 dlev May 2, 2009 at 4:50 PM Twitter: @dlevanphotos

Retweeted, HAH!

Reply

69 tori May 4, 2009 at 8:01 PM

works fine for me….comments that are in rapid succession overwrite each other… it had nothing to do with the word twitter.

Reply

70 Fred May 17, 2009 at 7:37 AM

The test of censoring is too general to tell if they are censoring the use of twitter and facebook or is it something else? I have conducted my own tests. If you try to scroll a bunch of words in your updates for example:

!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!
!!!!!
!!!
!!
!

Facebook will delete the middle posts. This could have been the same in this case. Conduct more detailed tests and eliminate these counterpoints and then I may believe you.

Reply

71 isben August 8, 2009 at 5:37 AM

it’s because you suck. it’s as simple as that. so stop complaining. bi*ch has nothing better to do than whine.

Reply

72 Larry Hood February 8, 2010 at 5:35 PM

I am very political. I recently set my new status to the following.
“South Carolina falls to its knees before the mighty big brother. You can have freedom of speech, just register with us first so we can censor what you say.
http://www.scstatehouse.gov/code/t23c029.htm

This was not allowed to be my status. I posted it on newsfeed, whats on my mind, etc. I thought at first maybe they have to agree to allow it now. I waited 30 minutes and it is STILL not my status. Looks like facebook is just another way to catalog people for the New World Order.

Reply

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Previous post:

Next post: