Tropicana is Advertising. Are You?

by Ari Herzog on February 12, 2009 · 7 comments

Tropicana orange juice and its new advertising campaignUpon returning to Boston’s Logan Airport several weeks ago, I observed a highway billboard on the airport’s outskirts, overlooking Route 1A: An advertisement for a new carton design for Tropicana orange juice.

The New York Times’ Stuart Elliott wrote last month about the $35 million juice campaign encompassing newspaper ads and future television commercials:

The campaign carries the typographically challenging theme “squeeze it’s a natural,” which is intended to evoke the way oranges are turned into Tropicana along with the warm way in which the company wants consumers to embrace the brand.

Despite my incredulous reaction to a multimillion price tag for a brand that most Americans are already familiar with, I congratulate the company for advertising.

If you are a business and are not advertising, wake up and smell the, err, oranges!

A special report released last month on Entrepreneur.com underscores the importance of advertising during rocky economic times in accordance with several economic research surveys.

Frequently cited, a McGraw-Hill Research survey of 600 companies between 1980 and 1985 determined that firms with level-funded or increased advertising expenses during the 1981-82 recession averaged a 256 percent growth for the subsequent three years!

A separate survey in 2004 by the American Association of Advertising Agencies of 2,700 firms found increased advertising in a recession has more benefits than increased spending during an economic expansion.

Of note, MarketSense studied the 1989-1991 recession and concluded:

“Jif peanut butter raised ad support and sales went up 57 percent; Kraft salad dressings increased advertising and saw a rise of 70 percent. In the beer category, overall spending was down 1 percent while Bud Light and Coors Light, each spending ahead of the category, saw sales increases of 15 percent and 16 percent respectively. Pizza Hut sales rose 61 percent and Taco Bell’s 40 percent, thanks to strong advertising support…”

Recession advertising is a must. I can’t say billboard advertising is dead–for clearly, Tropicana’s management and their PR strategy firm determined a need.

During the ride from the airport back home, I commented to my family that the billboard was a waste of money. My mother liked it and said the ad strengthened brand recognition and provided a visual memory the next time she would enter a supermarket. I suppose.

Fact is, companies need to be where their customers are. Everyone won’t like a billboard and everyone won’t like an email campaign. There are no easy answers, writes Shannon Paul.

I agree with Shannon that companies should stop doing marketing and start being social.

Tropicana recognizes this fact. By positioning a billboard by an airport, along a busy thoroughfare where families are routinely in a car together, the company reminds mothers (like mine) to notice the new carton design at the supermarket.

Most importantly, Tropicana is advertising.

So should you in this economy. What are you waiting for?

If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or following future articles by RSS subscription or email delivery.

Related posts:

  1. Treat Me as a Human
  2. Guest Post by Kenneth Weiss: When Social Media Becomes Slightware, Your Brand Does Not Stand a Chance

Comments:

{ 7 comments }

1 Alex Schleber February 12, 2009 at 3:36 AM

While I agree that it’s good to be advertising/marketing even in a recession, I have to say that Tropicana also badly needs it with their in my view botched redesign. What was wrong with the old logo/design with the orange and the straw, a brand that had successfully imprinted itself on the minds of millions of consumers?

Instead they went with a design that looks almost like a generic. It actually prompted me to look around for another OJ when I first saw it the other day, and I went home with a carton of HEB/Central Market Organic OJ instead… $1 more expensive, but actually better tasting and I guess healthier.

Branding FAIL.

Alex Schleber´s last blog post..Building Your Own TinyURL In Less Than 1 Hour Using Wordpress

2 Noa_Adamsky (Noa Adamsky) February 12, 2009 at 4:25 AM

Twitter Comment


RT @ariherzog Tropicana is advertising. Are you? [link to post]

– Posted using Chat Catcher

3 writingroads (Julie Roads) February 12, 2009 at 7:15 AM

Twitter Comment


Marketing during rough econ times – studies show…[link to post] by @ariherzog

– Posted using Chat Catcher

4 tommytrc (thomas clifford) February 12, 2009 at 7:28 AM

Twitter Comment


RT @writingroads: Marketing during rough econ times – studies show…[link to post] by @ariherzog

– Posted using Chat Catcher

5 Jeremy Goldberg February 12, 2009 at 10:52 AM

I completely agree with Alex Schleber. Tropicana may be spending a lot of money, but I think they made a poor choice of time for a new design, people would want familiarity and in addition – I did not recognize that this generic looking container was Tropicana – I probably only noticed when I saw the price, and then I did switch to store brand. Didn’t they change branding just a few years ago? It used to use a Hawaiian looking girl.

6 Danny Brown February 14, 2009 at 1:18 PM Twitter: @DannyBrown

While the merits can be discussed about the design, there’s no denying that at least Tropicana are getting it right in that they’re still actively pursuing customers.

There are a lot of businesses that are putting their heads in the sand until the big bad economy goes away. While this approach might not necessarily lose you money (inasmuch as ad or marketing spend), you can be pretty sure it won’t get you more money either.

From a consumer point of view, advertising shows confidence and confidence breeds purchase power. More companies need to take a look at Tropicana, and then take a look at themselves.

Danny Brown´s last blog post..Little Green Men

7 Alissa February 19, 2009 at 3:54 PM

I’m neutral on Tropicana’s new look. The campaign did remind me that I want to buy some white grapefruit juice, and they’re the only folks who seem to sell it. Somehow Pepsi’s re-branding struck me as much more odd. (At least from the massive subway station poster blitz I saw.) Like Tropicana juice, Pepsi’s main product hasn’t changed in years. They didn’t try to focus on an an aspect of the drink itself, or how awesome drinking it will make a person, just the design of the logo. (An uglier logo, in my opinion.) What, drinking Pepsi isn’t going to get me laid or rich or nothing?

At the end of the day, though, hammering straight-up brand-recognition might not be a bad strategy. I’ve been seeing those ugly swooshy logos everywhere, like them or not.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: Reinventing the Supermarket: Proactive Merchandising, Mobile Marketing, and Age-Friendly Aisles

Next post: Local Vodka in Newburyport: Why Not?

ConvoTrack