<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Understanding Web 2.0 in 5 Minutes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ariwriter.com/understanding-web-20-in-5-minutes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ariwriter.com/understanding-web-20-in-5-minutes/</link>
	<description>Strategies and tips on social media and online marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:20:22 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The New Online World and Social Media &#171; Living Leadership</title>
		<link>http://ariwriter.com/understanding-web-20-in-5-minutes/comment-page-1/#comment-1035</link>
		<dc:creator>The New Online World and Social Media &#171; Living Leadership</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 01:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ariwriter.wordpress.com/2008/07/14/understanding-web-20-in-5-minutes/#comment-1035</guid>
		<description>[...] One of Horton’s ideas was true in 2002 and remains extremely valid even today. He explains that “one cannot use technology creatively without understanding the parameters of technology. He gives the example of being an amateur woodworker and needing to know the many uses of the one tool, the hammer. The point he makes is timeless and very important. In order to Effectively interact online and become involved with the future of the web and the role it plays in PR and all aspects of life, one must understand the many online parameters. There must be an understanding that the web goes beyond one or two uses and can become a part of everything we do. Click on a video that shows the importance of understanding new technology and what it means. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] One of Horton’s ideas was true in 2002 and remains extremely valid even today. He explains that “one cannot use technology creatively without understanding the parameters of technology. He gives the example of being an amateur woodworker and needing to know the many uses of the one tool, the hammer. The point he makes is timeless and very important. In order to Effectively interact online and become involved with the future of the web and the role it plays in PR and all aspects of life, one must understand the many online parameters. There must be an understanding that the web goes beyond one or two uses and can become a part of everything we do. Click on a video that shows the importance of understanding new technology and what it means. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Some Thoughts on Social Media Such as This &#171; Living Leadership</title>
		<link>http://ariwriter.com/understanding-web-20-in-5-minutes/comment-page-1/#comment-1034</link>
		<dc:creator>Some Thoughts on Social Media Such as This &#171; Living Leadership</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 00:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ariwriter.wordpress.com/2008/07/14/understanding-web-20-in-5-minutes/#comment-1034</guid>
		<description>[...] One of Horton’s ideas was true in 2002 and remains extremely valid even today. He explains that “one cannot use technology creatively without understanding the parameters of technology. He gives the example of being an amateur woodworker and needing to know the many uses of the one tool, the hammer. The point he makes is timeless and very important. In order to Effectively interact online and become involved with the future of the web and the role it plays in PR and all aspects of life, one must understand the many online parameters. There must be an understanding that the web goes beyond one or two uses and can become a part of everything we do. Click on a video that shows the importance of understanding new technology and what it means. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] One of Horton’s ideas was true in 2002 and remains extremely valid even today. He explains that “one cannot use technology creatively without understanding the parameters of technology. He gives the example of being an amateur woodworker and needing to know the many uses of the one tool, the hammer. The point he makes is timeless and very important. In order to Effectively interact online and become involved with the future of the web and the role it plays in PR and all aspects of life, one must understand the many online parameters. There must be an understanding that the web goes beyond one or two uses and can become a part of everything we do. Click on a video that shows the importance of understanding new technology and what it means. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bradley L. Jones</title>
		<link>http://ariwriter.com/understanding-web-20-in-5-minutes/comment-page-1/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>Bradley L. Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ariwriter.wordpress.com/2008/07/14/understanding-web-20-in-5-minutes/#comment-206</guid>
		<description>Ari -&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Thanks for the comments on the Web 2.0 Heroes book. I appreciate you taking the time to read it and to comment on it. The book was interesting and fun to pull together as many of the people I interviewed had great stories to tell. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Brad!&lt;br/&gt;----------------&lt;br/&gt;Bradley L. Jones</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ari -</p>
<p>Thanks for the comments on the Web 2.0 Heroes book. I appreciate you taking the time to read it and to comment on it. The book was interesting and fun to pull together as many of the people I interviewed had great stories to tell. </p>
<p>Brad!<br />&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />Bradley L. Jones</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dick Monahan</title>
		<link>http://ariwriter.com/understanding-web-20-in-5-minutes/comment-page-1/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Dick Monahan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 13:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ariwriter.wordpress.com/2008/07/14/understanding-web-20-in-5-minutes/#comment-205</guid>
		<description>I have not seen the article on line (except to get the link for you).  I&#039;m a subscriber.  I read the &quot;dead tree&quot; version.  I hate reading text on a screen, and never chase the links, as that is too distracting.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I, too, am a book reader.  But, in another dose of heavy irony, I am currently reading the new translation of Herodotus, which is so heavily footnoted, it might as well be full of links.  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not seen the article on line (except to get the link for you).  I&#8217;m a subscriber.  I read the &#8220;dead tree&#8221; version.  I hate reading text on a screen, and never chase the links, as that is too distracting.</p>
<p>I, too, am a book reader.  But, in another dose of heavy irony, I am currently reading the new translation of Herodotus, which is so heavily footnoted, it might as well be full of links.  <img src='http://ariwriter.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ari Herzog</title>
		<link>http://ariwriter.com/understanding-web-20-in-5-minutes/comment-page-1/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>Ari Herzog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 21:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ariwriter.wordpress.com/2008/07/14/understanding-web-20-in-5-minutes/#comment-204</guid>
		<description>Dick: I hadn&#039;t seen that article. Thanks!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I read the first few paragraphs to see where Carr was going with his theory, and by scanning longer passages, the initial idea did not change.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Three comments on that piece:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;First, he quotes everyone from HAL in &quot;2001&quot; to Socrates; how is that any different than hyperlinking, propelling the reader to the very data that Carr claims the Internet is causing? He even has a link to Socrates.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Moreover, this is on a web page; what does the print version of this story look like? Is there a print version?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Second, Carr ironically commits what one of his interview subjects rejects: long blog posts. Is a magazine online article not a blog post when there are &quot;article tools&quot; at the page bottom for emailing, Digging, Redditing?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;As proof, pathologist Bruce Feldman says in the piece, &quot;I can’t read War and Peace anymore. I’ve lost the ability to do that. Even a blog post of more than three or four paragraphs is too much to absorb. I skim it.&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Third, I take books out from the library every week. I&#039;m about to walk over there and check out two more titles on reserve for me. Not e-books but real physically-bound books with paper and ink. Am I Carr&#039;s exception?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dick: I hadn&#8217;t seen that article. Thanks!</p>
<p>I read the first few paragraphs to see where Carr was going with his theory, and by scanning longer passages, the initial idea did not change.</p>
<p>Three comments on that piece:</p>
<p>First, he quotes everyone from HAL in &#8220;2001&#8243; to Socrates; how is that any different than hyperlinking, propelling the reader to the very data that Carr claims the Internet is causing? He even has a link to Socrates.</p>
<p>Moreover, this is on a web page; what does the print version of this story look like? Is there a print version?</p>
<p>Second, Carr ironically commits what one of his interview subjects rejects: long blog posts. Is a magazine online article not a blog post when there are &#8220;article tools&#8221; at the page bottom for emailing, Digging, Redditing?</p>
<p>As proof, pathologist Bruce Feldman says in the piece, &#8220;I can’t read War and Peace anymore. I’ve lost the ability to do that. Even a blog post of more than three or four paragraphs is too much to absorb. I skim it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Third, I take books out from the library every week. I&#8217;m about to walk over there and check out two more titles on reserve for me. Not e-books but real physically-bound books with paper and ink. Am I Carr&#8217;s exception?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dick Monahan</title>
		<link>http://ariwriter.com/understanding-web-20-in-5-minutes/comment-page-1/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>Dick Monahan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 21:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ariwriter.wordpress.com/2008/07/14/understanding-web-20-in-5-minutes/#comment-203</guid>
		<description>Is Web 2.0 the reason I have to click 2.0 different &quot;Post a comment&quot; links to get here?  :-)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Have you read the article from the current Atlantic (link below)?  It postulates that the use of the internet is actually changing our brains.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200807/google</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Web 2.0 the reason I have to click 2.0 different &#8220;Post a comment&#8221; links to get here?  <img src='http://ariwriter.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Have you read the article from the current Atlantic (link below)?  It postulates that the use of the internet is actually changing our brains.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200807/google">http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200807/google</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
